
Rented hashrate costs more than it earns, and the gap is not small. On 13 September 2026 the cheapest SHA-256 rig listed on MiningRigRentals asked 0.00061 BTC per PH per day, while 1 PH/s pointed at Bitcoin produced 0.00047546 BTC that day. The going rate was 0.00073 — about 53% above yield. Rent hashrate, mine with it into a pool, and you hand over roughly a third of what you paid.
That is not a flaw in the market. It is what the market is for: renters are buying something other than average returns, and the rest of this page is about what that something is, when it is worth buying, and how to run the numbers yourself on any algorithm and any day.
Bitcoin makes this comparison unusually clean: rentals are priced in BTC and mining pays in BTC, so no exchange rate or price forecast enters the arithmetic. Either the hashrate earns back what you paid for it, or it does not.
Bitcoin paid miners 452.7 BTC a day over the last 1,008 blocks against a network of about 952 EH/s. That is 0.00047546 BTC per PH/s per day — the yield side of the trade. Here is the cost side, straight from the marketplace’s own API:
| SHA-256 rental price | BTC per PH/day | Against a yield of 0.00047546 | You lose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest rig listed | 0.00061000 | 1.28× | 22% |
| Marketplace suggested price | 0.00072790 | 1.53× | 35% |
| Last 10 rentals | 0.00071877 | 1.51× | 34% |
| Last 20 rentals | 0.00080178 | 1.69× | 41% |
| Last 30 rentals | 0.00127724 | 2.69× | 63% |
Prices read from the MiningRigRentals API on 13 September 2026; the yield is computed from the Bitcoin network on the same day. Both move — the point is not these five numbers but the shape they make, and that shape has been stable for years: the ask sits above the yield, and the premium widens when a coin gets exciting.
here. There is no difference to keep. At the cheapest listing you recover 78 cents on the dollar, at the going rate about 65 cents. The only way that trade wins is if the rig is priced below yield — which happens, briefly, and is covered below.
Every rental decision reduces to one comparison, and it takes two minutes with a calculator. The rental side comes from the marketplace listing; the mining side comes from the network you intend to point it at. Work in the same currency on both sides or the answer means nothing.
yield per unit per day = (daily network issuance in coin) ÷ (network hashrate in the same unit)
rental premium = (rental price per unit per day) ÷ (yield per unit per day)
Worked, for Bitcoin, on the day of writing:
452.7 BTC per day ÷ 952,000 PH/s = 0.00047546 BTC per PH per day
0.00072790 ÷ 0.00047546 = 1.53 → renting costs 53% more than mining yields
On altcoins the comparison needs one more step, because the rental is priced in BTC while the coin pays you in its own token. Convert the coin yield into BTC at the current rate before dividing, and remember that the rate you get is the rate when you sell — not when you rented. Current network hashrate for each chain we track sits on our coin pages, and the daily issuance is the block reward times blocks per day.
slowly; coin prices move in minutes. A rig priced yesterday against a coin that doubled overnight can be worth renting today — that window is the entire business model of the people who rent profitably, and it closes in hours. If you are not watching for it, you are not in that trade; you are just paying retail.
The premium is not a scam, and understanding where it comes from tells you when it is worth paying. Three forces push the ask above the mining yield, and all three are rational.
That third point is the one most guides miss. Rented hashrate is a short-dated instrument, and people who use it well are buying variance or information, not income.
Renting is a poor way to earn coins and a good way to do four other things. Each of these is a purchase where the 30% premium buys something that owning hardware could not deliver faster or cheaper.
goal is coins arriving steadily with no work, renting is the most expensive route to it — and cloud mining contracts, which are the same trade with a longer lock-up and less control, are worse still.
The catalogues look deep. MiningRigRentals lists 249 SHA-256 rigs offering 2.45 EH/s of capacity. Actually rented at the moment of reading: 14.66 PH/s. That is 0.60% of what is on the shelf.
| Algorithm | Rigs listed | Capacity offered | Actually rented | Utilisation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHA-256 (Bitcoin) | 249 | 2.45 EH/s | 14.66 PH/s | 0.60% |
| Scrypt (LTC/DOGE) | 407 | 583.94 TH/s | 2.65 TH/s | 0.45% |
| RandomX (Monero) | 241 | 1.66 GH/s | 21.74 MH/s | 1.31% |
| kHeavyHash (Kaspa) | 75 | 50.03 PH/s | 36.89 TH/s | 0.07% |
| KawPOW (Ravencoin) | 147 | 3.40 TH/s | 772 MH/s | 0.02% |
| X11 | 35 | 390.16 TH/s | 13.64 TH/s | 3.49% |
Two practical readings of that table. First, supply is not your constraint — you will almost always find a rig, so shop on price and reputation rather than grabbing the first listing. Second, low utilisation is the market agreeing with the arithmetic above: at these prices, few people rent, and those who do are not renting for yield.
The mechanics are the same on every hashrate marketplace, and none of them are difficult. What catches people out is the order: you are configuring the destination before you own the hashrate, and a mistake there burns the whole rental.
This choice decides whether a short rental pays out at all, and it catches people who have only ever mined with hardware they own. A rental is time-boxed; most pools are not built around that, and the mismatch can leave you with accepted shares and nothing credited. Two rules cover every case.
PPLNS pools are a poor match for short rentals. Under PPLNS you are paid when the pool finds a block while your shares are still inside its window — so a three-hour rental can submit shares, end, and have the block land after you are gone. PPS and FPPS pools credit every share immediately, which is exactly what a time-boxed rental needs. The mechanics of each model are in our guide to payout models.
The exception is the solo case: if you rented hashrate to buy a shot at a whole block, point it at a solo pool and accept the lottery you came for.
Five failures account for nearly every bad rental, and four of them are entirely on the renter’s side of the transaction. None involve fraud — they are ordinary mistakes that cost the whole rental, because a rental clock does not stop for a configuration error. Read them before your first one, not after:
Not as a way to earn coins. On 13 September 2026 SHA-256 rentals asked 0.00061–0.00073 BTC per PH per day while that hashrate mined 0.00047546 — a premium of 28% to 53%. Renting pays only when you catch a rig priced below yield, or when what you want is a block, a test or a short position rather than average returns.
Price is quoted per unit of hashrate per day and varies by algorithm: SHA-256 around 0.00073 BTC per PH per day, Scrypt around 0.00000788 BTC per GH per day, RandomX around 0.00066721 BTC per MH per day, on the marketplace’s own suggested pricing. Multiply by the hashrate and the days you want.
Any coin that uses the algorithm you rent. You are renting SHA-256 or kHeavyHash, not “Bitcoin” or “Kaspa” — the coin is decided by the pool you point the rented hashrate at.
It is more honest, in the sense that you see the machine, the price per unit and the term, and you control the pool. Cloud mining contracts lock you in for months with none of that visibility. Neither is a reliable way to earn more than buying the coin.
A PPS or FPPS pool for short rentals, because shares are paid immediately; a solo pool if you rented to chase a whole block. PPLNS can leave a short rental unpaid when the block lands after your window closes.
Rented hashrate has been used in 51% attacks on small proof-of-work chains, which is why coins with low network hashrate relative to marketplace supply are considered fragile. It is also why a chain’s hashrate compared with what is rentable is worth checking before you mine it at all.