Choosing where to route your Litecoin hashrate is one of the few levers that still has real impact. As LTC difficulty and competition between operators keep rising, miners care less about “just hashing” and more about stability, merged payouts, clear dashboards, and support. This article explains how it works, which platforms currently dominate public statistics, what payout models they offer, and how to join them without losing income on thresholds or misconfiguration.
|
Litecoin (LTC)
Scrypt
|
History for 7 days |
Hashrate 3.38 Ph/s |
In the last 100 blocks |
Last block |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pool4ever
|
- | - | - |
-
|
-
|
|
|
DxPool +
|
|
4.99 Th/s |
-
|
3017343
2 d
|
||
|
AntPool +
|
|
700.00 Th/s |
19
0.47
|
3018461
7 min.
|
||
|
ViaBTC +
|
929.99 Th/s |
23
-3.23
|
3018462
6 min.
|
|||
|
Trustpool +
|
|
96.88 Th/s |
-
|
-
|
||
|
EMCD +
|
|
177.53 Th/s |
-
|
-
|
||
|
F2Pool +
|
|
1.09 Ph/s |
33
2.76
|
3018458
14 min.
|
||
|
DogPool +
|
|
12.89 Th/s |
-
|
-
|
||
|
Okminer +
|
|
3.50 Th/s |
-
|
3017279
2 d
|
||
|
Kryptex +
|
|
3.82 Th/s |
-
|
-
|
||
|
Poolin +
|
|
22.90 Th/s |
-
|
3018134
15 h
|
||
|
Mining-dutch +
|
|
13.72 Th/s |
1
0.62
|
3018429
1 h
|
||
|
Hash Space +
|
- | - | - |
-
|
-
|
|
|
Cloverpool +
|
|
22.58 Th/s |
-
|
3018299
7 h
|
||
|
Ntminerpool +
|
|
161.13 Th/s |
-
|
2848657
18 d
|
||
|
Litecoinpool +
|
|
97.74 Th/s |
2
-1.06
|
3018412
2 h
|
||
|
SBICrypto +
|
|
17.42 Th/s |
1
0.53
|
3018384
3 h
|
||
|
Luxor
|
|
12.96 Th/s |
-
|
3017971
22 h
|
||
|
SpiderPool +
|
|
- | - |
-
|
2967173
27 d
|
|
|
Binance +
|
|
12.08 Th/s |
2
1.67
|
3018459
12 min.
|
These collectives leverage their aggregated hashrate to solve blocks with far greater frequency than any individual miner could, systematically distributing the rewards according to each participant’s verifiable contribution. Let’s break down the mechanics of how they actually operate.
A mining operator is an online coordination service that lets many miners combine their Scrypt hashrate and trade the lottery‑style solo payout for a predictable stream. Your ASIC connects to a Stratum endpoint, receives work, sends back shares, and the platform credits them to your account. Because thousands of devices work together, blocks are found far more often than a single miner could ever achieve, so even modest setups get regular income.
Modern ones also enable merged mining: while you are solving work, the backend solves DOGE and several auxiliary Scrypt coins. To the miner, it looks like a single operator with multiple balances. This is why, in 2025, the competitive options are those that clearly support merged pools.
The coin uses the Scrypt hashing algorithm and aims for a 2.5‑minute block time. The protocol cuts the block reward every 840,000 blocks. The next reduction is already visible in public halving trackers. Each cut makes transaction fees and merged‑coin payouts relatively more important, so miners should prefer payout models that also distribute fees.
Look beyond the advertised fee. Factor in the minimum payout threshold, withdrawal fees, and how efficiently the pool distributes merged coins like DOGE. The true cost and profitability come from this combined calculation.
PPS/FPPS for stable, predictable daily income, PPLNS for lower long-term costs if you can handle variance, and SOLO only if you have a massive hashrate and are aiming for the block reward jackpot.
Transparency is key. A pool that actively maintains a changelog shows commitment to communication and improvement. Detailed pages for each merged coin indicate clear documentation and reliable tracking of your additional earnings.
Even the biggest platform loses value if your workers create too many stale shares due to high ping. Use simple network tools to ping the pool’s Stratum servers and choose the one with the lowest and most stable response time. This directly impacts your efficiency and earnings.
This is a critical operational practice. If your primary pool experiences downtime, DDOS attacks, or suddenly changes policies unfavorably, your hashrate can automatically failover to the backup, ensuring no mining time is lost.
Merged mining (or auxiliary proof-of-work) isn’t just a feature—it’s the primary financial benefit of mining Litecoin today. It’s a mechanism that allows your equipment to simultaneously mine blocks for not only LTC but also other cryptocurrencies using the same Scrypt algorithm, without any need for extra hardware or electricity.
In essence, you’re paying one power bill but receiving income in multiple assets. On top of your primary Litecoin rewards, your account is credited with a stream of additional coins. The most significant of these is Dogecoin (DOGE), but many leading pools support a whole range of other Scrypt-based coins such as BELLS, LKY, PEP, JKC, DINGO, SHIC, and CRC. Therefore, the total number of coins that can be mined alongside LTC on top pools can reach 8-10, significantly boosting your overall earnings per kilowatt-hour.
Since this requires no additional hardware or power, it’s crucial to choose a pool that clearly documents its merged mining payouts and actively updates its list of supported coins, maximizing your passive income stream.





Statistics show the following five services at the top. All of them support merged Scrypt, all of them publish their fees, and all of them have working endpoints for Litecoin.
Public pools reduce variance but do not remove risk. Miners should be aware of at least five typical problem areas.
A solo space gives you full infrastructure — Stratum access, stats, dashboards — but pays the entire block only to the miner who actually finds it.
Profitability depends on power price, ASIC efficiency, network difficulty, and coin price; the pool mostly affects payout stability.
Practically no – the network is ASIC‑dominated.
All five in the current list do, but payout thresholds differ – check the dashboard.
For beginners and those seeking stable income, start with PPS or FPPS. These models provide predictable daily payments for every share you submit, effectively eliminating the variance of luck. Once you gain experience and want to potentially lower your effective fees, you can experiment with PPLNS, which pays based on your contribution to recently found blocks but comes with higher income volatility.
o, count effective cost: fee + minimum + payout frequency + stale handling.
Validate your ASICs against the current electricity price, pick one operator from the live top‑5, enable merged payouts, connect to the closest server, and benchmark for 24–48 hours. After that, scale the farm and review fee tables monthly — small changes compound quickly.